User talk:Vanished Account Byeznhpyxeuztibuo/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


rollbacks

[edit]

You accidentally added some 'images' to Category:White House videos. Since it was done with VFC, I assumed it was a simple mistake. Reventtalk 00:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I might have seen it when I went through that category later, but I thought it was just videos to videos. I appreciate you catching that mistake for me. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant?

[edit]

This edit seems to me to just add a redundant category. Photo -> Category:Pop Conference 2014 -> Category:April 2014 in Washington (state). Am I missing something? - Jmabel ! talk 17:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To me it seems like another legitimate way to search for an image depending on what you are looking for, but it really doesn't affect me on this image, so do what you wish on it. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

[edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Jasonanaggie, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Reventtalk 03:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File renaming

[edit]

Hi, Jasonanaggie, this file should be renamed because of #2, to change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays. Since you were the uploader, your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks! -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Indivisible Guide 2016-12-31 v1.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 18:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ВЫБОРЫ В ГОСУДАРСТВЕННУЮ ДУМУ 4 декабря 2011.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ВЫБОРЫ В ГОСУДАРСТВЕННУЮ ДУМУ 4 декабря 2011.pdf]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 18:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've seen you replaced {{ISOdate}} by {{Taken on}} for several of my images. Sorry, but this is not a improvement. I don't like the category Photographs taken at at the first position. The information is not very important for the users. Please don't use Taken on for my images. Thank you very much. BTW: It is overcategorization. --XRay talk 19:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking about your replacements. I'm not sure, but may be I'll replace {{ISOdate}} by {{Taken on}} for all my images with parameter cat=no. It will be done with my bot. --XRay talk 20:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I only prefer Taken on over ISO date as it makes it easy to look at pictures of the same areas by time with the same location; it seemed to be ideal for the kinds of pictures you had uploaded; to make a sort of mosaic over time (Google Earth style). It's up to you, I was just seeing what it would look like on a map and it looked interesting, I had no idea you would be watching the files or I would have reverted them. Sorry. Jasonanaggie (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Vanished Account Byeznhpyxeuztibuo!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Elisfkc (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russian Federation, State Duma Elections, 4 December 2011 Final Report.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 11:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ВЫБОРЫ В ГОСУДАРСТВЕННУЮ ДУМУ 4 декабря 2011.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 11:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secretary Kerry's Address on Climate Change at MIT.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Reventtalk 17:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transcodes

[edit]

I don't know if it's you, but I've seen a number of your recent uploads that appear to have failed to transcode at higher resolutions, that were thrown back in the queue... an example would be File:Secretary Kerry Delivers Remarks at the U.S. Naval Academy.webm. If you are doing so, please don't. If they have 'recently' (in the past few days) failed to transcode, rerunning them is not going to solve whatever the problem is, and it risks clogging the system again. Files over a GB or so in size are simply not handled well, and when you reset the transcode it removes the error message from the SQL database, making it harder to see if there is a 'real' problem instead of it simply being 'too big'.

Working on getting 'everything' transcoded is a work in progress. Thanks. - Reventtalk 20:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be more specific, the changes made to address 'timeout' issues might have been a little too aggressive, but we need to be able to see what actually 'fails'. - Reventtalk 20:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYI https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T155098 will help a lot, once done. - Reventtalk 02:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing, thanks. Jasonanaggie (talk) 09:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jasonanaggie. In what way is File:2017 Trump dossier by Christopher Steele, Ex-MI6 Russia Desk Intelligence Agent.pdf a work of the US Government? Isn't this the dossier that Steele prepared himself, and therefore likely copyrighted by Orbis Business Intelligence or possibly by whoever their client was? --Rrburke (talk) 15:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I note that you've changed it to {{CC-BY-2.0}}, but where is the permission from the copyright holder? --Rrburke (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Vanished Account Byeznhpyxeuztibuo!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Elisfkc (talk) 04:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017 Trump dossier by Christopher Steele, Ex-MI6 Russia Desk Intelligence Agent.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2017 Trump dossier by Christopher Steele, Ex-MI6 Russia Desk Intelligence Agent.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Mike1901 (talk) 09:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iridium-1 Hosted Webcast.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WH.gov license reviews

[edit]

Hi Jason. I've removed about 500 of your uploaded videos from wh.gov from the license review category. My issue with these is that they all have the wh.gov watermark and are obviously the work of whitehouse employees. These are speeches given by Obama and other officials, close-ups of him or Michelle Obama interacting with people, etc, such as File:9-8-15- White House Press Briefing.webm. Why do these need a review? 500 files take a very long time to review, and reviewing files where the source isn't in question seems like a waste of volunteer time. I'm posting this here, but I'd like to get some opinions on whether or not we can forego reviews for videos with the wh.gov watermark. @Jameslwoodward: , @Clindberg: , @Revent: , @Czar: Thoughts? I'm not going to waste any more of my time on these myself, as this is hours of needless button pushing. @Elisfkc: also tags Navy/Airforce/Marines images for review, many of which have obvious EXIF that clearly indicate they're the work of a serviceman/woman. @Stemoc: questioned this practice earlier, and the only answer I could come up with was empty formality. If this needs to be discussed elsewhere, that's fine, but I'm starting here because Jason is uploading hundreds of wh.gov videos (no problem with that of course), so something needs to be figured out going forward and figured out pretty quickly. Without me reviewing these, they would likely just sit there clogging up the review category, making it harder to review files that really require review, and as I said I'm not going to review another one of these, especially when they come in dumps of 500. lNeverCry 02:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: I've marked a fair number with {{subst:PDr}}... it might make sense to run VFC across them, and mark them as a group. - Reventtalk 02:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Revent: That would be easy enough with custom replace of course, but it still suggests these need review. My position is that they don't need review of any kind and that Jason and Elisfkc don't need to mark these with {{LicenseReview}} at all. There's also the issue that some reviewers might review the files rather than using {{subst:PDr}} because they don't know about it. Since we only have one major uploader in Jason, his stopping use of {{LicenseReview}} would be the most workable answer. Carl looks to agree. lNeverCry 03:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@INeverCry: Oh, I don't disagree. The only real reason I see for putting a PD review on them is for when 'someday' someone does another run to flag unreviewed YouTube videos. - Reventtalk 03:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Revent: I've seen videos and museum images that were uploaded as far back as 2007/2008 marked for review that way... There are some coder people around here that make more work than they do. lNeverCry 04:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the odds of a problem seem so low on those that it's not really worth it to waste admin time. Same with PD-USGov-Military. License review should be more for where someone needs to check the actual source website since that is where the only license is available -- not files which are inherently PD regardless of their actual source. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will go without having the license review in the future, I was just trying to stay on the right side of the admins in Wikimedia. Thanks. Jasonanaggie (talk) 03:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Now if I could just get the K-Pop people to review each other's uploads, I might have some time to do something I actually like... lNeverCry 04:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@INeverCry: I did it. I honestly didn't think about the fact that they probably did not need license review, since they were from the White House. I just always figure that it is better that files get reviewed than having them not be reviewed. I will avoid doing something like for obviously ok files that in the future. Elisfkc (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need to be very careful about what sites we do this with. I think the White House is almost certainly OK, but Carl's suggestion that we not review images with {{PD-USGov-Military}} seems way off base. The sites run by the military often have photographs from vendors which newbies upload with the PD template without any regard for whether they really have copyrights or not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I was more thinking of the images coming from the main military media feeds -- those are virtually always OK. Still, the license review process to me seems more geared towards where the source in particular specified a free license, which needs to be checked at that site. It is always fine to double-check, but don't think I would add the license needed template on *all* PD-USGov-Military files as a matter of course, especially when there is EXIF indicating DoD production or a VIRIN number. I would use some discretion adding that tag for PD-USGov works. Non-high-resolution ones would be more likely to need it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate uploads

[edit]

See File:20160914 Press Briefing HD.webm and File:9-14-16- White House Press Briefing.webm. There is no point to uploading multiple copies. Please don't. - Reventtalk 14:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't intend to, I am trying to complete the archive from the Obama administration and with some of the dates being of in one place or the other, even I might make a mistake. Sorry for the trouble this caused; I beg forgiveness; I will try to prevent in my attempt to complete my little project to replicate this type of mistake. I will ensure I request speedy deletion on any that might slip by. Jasonanaggie (talk) 05:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I seemed 'accusatory'... that was not my intention. We have cases of people uploading the same video at multiple resolutions intentionally, likely not realizing that they will be scaled down from the best version automatically. I'm aware that you are trying to complete the collection (and this is a very good thing, even through the 'rate' of doing so is yet again hammering the video scalers). The point, really, is that if you upload a better version of the same video it's far better to do it 'on top' of the older one.
I think you noticed that I re-arranged the categorization of those, with 'in year' categories, and added the sort keys. Hopefully that will make it a lot easier... once a category gets spread onto multiple pages, it's really hard to manage. - Reventtalk 08:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, see https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/ - it's where the old website will be moved. - Reventtalk 08:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Reventtalk 14:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

White House Press Briefing

[edit]

Hi Jason, Why do you think these White House Press Briefings have to be uploaded here? I don't really see how there are in scope. In addition, they block the transcode queue, and prevent other files to be process in a reasonable time. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They will be moved/deleted from a public access location, and I am just making sure to get them in place before tomorrow with the new POTUS. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, let me point out that these briefings will be great in the future to hear the issues of the day when looking back in history, there are very few Public Domain videos that can do this for history sake. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arrives at Wattay International Airport in Vientiane, Laos, on July 11, 2012. (AP Photo) (7590129836).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(tJosve05a (c) 22:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you might want to fix your mistaken category insertion. please use visual file change with care. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 10:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing. What is with this set of 498 edits in which you added Category:2007 Women's March to files that are already in Category:Women's March on Washington because they're in Washington D.C.? Do you need someone to do this cleanup for you, or are you working on it? --Closeapple (talk) 14:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize that I had appended a bad category; I removed it from the files I added it to. Thanks for letting me know. Jasonanaggie (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for fixing that. there is a lot of metadata cleanup to do, and visual file change is useful. it is better practice to test out on about 20 first, or to replicate a manual process. first do no harm, and cleanup after oneself are good practices. cheers. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 23:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, something is wrong with this file, can you fix it? Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It just looks like it was a bad upload, not sure why, I will have to re-upload it. I nominated it for deletion.Jasonanaggie (talk) 01:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Those stash-related failures and the need for server side uploads should be mostly eliminated. I'm currently restarting all the workers, so some of your currently running tasks may fail for weird reasons. There is only one worker currently alive ready to serve new tasks with new async chunked uploading code, the other two are busy finishing up before I can restart them (to reload its code). --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I killed the rest of the tasks because they are gonna encounter stash-related failures anyways. Feel free to restart them; those stash-related failures shouldn't happen anymore with the task resolved. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great; I'll give it a try and see. Jasonanaggie (talk) 18:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Texas State Archive from flickr

[edit]
Example photo (1970)

Hi Jason,

it's better to have a tracking category for all files from Texas State Archive. May you please create one?

They should also be better categorized, just putting them into "Category:Beef" is IMHO not enough.

Cheers--BCQ (talk) 15:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

US Courts (Pacer)

[edit]

Should No. 1:17-cv-00120 (E.D.Va. 2017) and Sarsour v. Trump be added to the description of File:CAIR v. Trump Complaint.pdf? I'm unfamiliar with the w:en:Bluebook or any E.D.Va. Bluebook interpretation. –2A03:2267:0:0:6552:2BED:BD78:2237 09:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zwvoclvb (18570089522).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zwvoclvb (18570089522).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Discasto talk 12:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Texas 2017 Governors Budget.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 12:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Audio- GOP lawmakers discuss health care at retreat.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 12:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACLU on Trump's conflicts face FOIA request.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 12:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coretta Scott King Letter against Jefferson Sessions.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 13:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Douglas Grandt vs. Rex Tillerson.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 13:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Trump attacks Judge (20170204-0512).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 16:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trump-International-Hotel-Liquor-License-Filings.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 16:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Purcell Declaration (Exhibit B).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 16:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Purcell Declaration (Exhibit C).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 16:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DARWEESH V. TRUMP 1- complaint.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RJaguar3 (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DARWEESH V. TRUMP 4 - motion for class certification.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RJaguar3 (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:CAIR v. Trump Complaint.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RJaguar3 (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trump Presidential Campaign (Roger Stone).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 22:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:United Nations Headquarters Renovation.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 23:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:'Crime and the Law' by Bernard Brown, 1969 (18137928705).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

JesseW (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Badzil (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jasonanaggie. Let me transform my quick deletion request into a full one. I understand your argument here but it's not clear to me that the US dept of Energy actually owns the copyright in this case. Let's talk further on the deletion request page and seek the opinion of other contributors. Cheers. Badzil (talk) 06:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (15705128256).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Island

[edit]

Sorry, I'll remove the category at File:New York City (New York, USA), Statue of Liberty -- 2012 -- 6818.jpg again. It's overcategorization. Please see COM:OVERCAT. --XRay talk 06:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an COM:OVERCAT; It is the location being shown. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The image is a member of Category:Exterior of the Statue of Liberty. This category is a member of Category:Statue of Liberty. And this is a member of Category:Liberty Island. So the image is already a member of Category:Liberty Island. Adding Category:Liberty Island would be overcategorization. --XRay talk 07:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tesla Model S (28898945604).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:110714-O-XX000-044 (5959228799).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mungoola (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:McLaren P1 Bahrain (28898946544).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mercedes B Class (28898946434).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honda Clarity (28898946694).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Audi A3 e-tron (28898946904).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Nissan Leaf (29414863862).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Ford Focus (28898946974).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hyundai Tucson (29524089075).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volvo XC90 (29547145265).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:U.S. Constitutional Amendments (26828563453).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Reventtalk 20:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dillon Anderson (NSC).jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dillon Anderson (NSC).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Dillon Anderson (NSC).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk 23:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dillon Anderson (NSC).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 13:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trump now overruled by Federal Judge tries to scare people.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 23:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 02:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasonanaggie: , this fil should be renamed because of #D. Since you were the uploader, your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Lotje 09:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing it out to me, I do appreciate it. It's been changed, I uploaded a bunch a while back that I forgot to change the names on and I don't think I'll find them all as hard as I look. Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jasonanaggie: thanks! Lotje 07:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 19:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Idw/layout Ras67 (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASA's Swift Satellite Captures Asteroid 2005 YU55 Flyby (video) (6333653934).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Discasto talk 13:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Macassar ([[User talk:Macassar|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Discasto talk 13:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I noticed that you uploaded File:Popular Science April 1931.djvu with a Template:Tl licence. Please note that PD-scan without a template parameter is not sufficient for publications from the United States. PD-scan will default to a message along with "the original file is out of copyright because the author died more than 70 years ago." US copyright, however, is based on the date of first publication and not on death of the author, so for old US magazines or other works you would have to use {{PD-scan|PD-US-not renewed}} or a similar combination. I have now changed the licence for Popular Science April 1931.djvu, but next time please try to add a specifical US licence parameter. Thank you. De728631 ([[User talk:De728631|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information; I didn't realize the distinction before you pointed it out. I'll make sure to use that template in the future. Cheers. Jasonanaggie ([[User talk:Jasonanaggie#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Taketa ([[User talk:Taketa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate IagoQnsi (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Discasto talk 08:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Monfulta ([[User talk:Monfulta|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate (tJosve05a (c) 18:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Jonatan Svensson Glad ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Discasto talk 22:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Zenwort ([[User talk:Zenwort|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Jaqen ([[User talk:Jaqen|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate-- Syrio posso aiutare? 15:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate-- Syrio posso aiutare? 19:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate MB298 ([[User talk:MB298|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate MB298 ([[User talk:MB298|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:24, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate MB298 ([[User talk:MB298|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate MB298 ([[User talk:MB298|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate MB298 ([[User talk:MB298|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Closeapple ([[User talk:Closeapple|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle ([[User talk:Sealle|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Threecharlie ([[User talk:Threecharlie|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Guanaco ([[User talk:Guanaco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate -- User: Perhelion 16:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate UAwiki ([[User talk:UAwiki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate B dash ([[User talk:B dash|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Autotranslate E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Jon Kolbert ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 02:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate --Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash ([[User talk:B dash|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Kulmalukko ([[User talk:Kulmalukko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Secondarywaltz ([[User talk:Secondarywaltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate B dash ([[User talk:B dash|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Animalparty ([[User talk:Animalparty|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

-- Kulmalukko ([[User talk:Kulmalukko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Secondarywaltz ([[User talk:Secondarywaltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Secondarywaltz ([[User talk:Secondarywaltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Secondarywaltz ([[User talk:Secondarywaltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]