Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

File:Maria Alexandrovna by Winterhalter (1857, Hermitage) 2FXD.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 18:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of Empress Maria Alexandrovna
  • Ask yourself, if we don't remove the patina on an FP of this, why should we remove it from other paintings? Restauration work on oil paintings should be done by a professional conservator-restorer to reveal the original colors, not by Photoshop. --Cart (talk) 20:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your clarification. I confess that I recently went to see the Mona Lisa and I confess that I found a painting with the "original" or restored colors, very different from the image I had of the Mona Lisa for so many years. It left me with a taste of falseness in my mouth, and all the paintings seemed bluish. I still have that feeling of having seen a fake Mona Lisa, even though I know it was the original. In some old objects such as coins, restoring them reduces their value because during the restoration process the passage of time is removed and sometimes implies destruction of something. I remember having taken some other photos (not in the Louvre) where the light was yellow and direct on the painting, which made the painting turn yellowish and with a reflection that I had to carefully remove in post-production, but it was not easy to find a reference point for the true color without removing the natural coloring of the painting. Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reliefs of Shiva Dancing (Banteay Srei).jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 15:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone door with a lintel engraved with the statue of Shiva, adorning the portal of the Banteay Srei Complex, Siem Reap, Cambodia .

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Cambodia #Stone gate lintel.- (Detail)

File:Youngzin Gemur Khar Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00176.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 12:01:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Youngzin cottage, Gemoor Khar, Lahaul

File:Rougequeue noir Douga006.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 22:23:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) Female

File:Phare de Ploumanac'h 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 21:35:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Ploumanac'h lighthouse (also called Phare de Mean Ruz) at the Côte de Granit Rose with the Sept-Îles in the background

File:BBPlover Scarborough Marsh.png

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 21:35:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-Bellied Plover in basic plumage.

File:Μονεμβασιά DJI 4359.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 17:09:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Monemvasia, Greece

File:Bloem van een Geranium palustre. 03-07-2021 (actm.).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 04:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 22:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexander Gardner

File:Vietnam peace agreement signing, 27580141, new.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 22:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

US Secretary of State William Rogers Signing the Paris Peace Accords, 27 January 1973, at Hotel Majestic (now The Peninsula Paris).

File:SB Dowitcher Bath.png

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 21:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Short-Billed Dowitcher Bathing

File:Hiena manchada (Crocuta crocuta), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-25, DD 26.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 21:00:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania

File:Meduses-Phyllorhiza punctata-Nausicaa-07-2024-Luc-Viatour.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 17:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jellyfish Phyllorhiza punctata at the Nausicaa aquarium

File:Champassak, Site de Vat Phou relief au palais des Femmes .jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 15:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone gate whose lintel is engraved with Airavata ruling three elephants Wat Phou, Champasak

File:Quiabo.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 13:13:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:WR134-Hamois-06-08-2024-Luc-Viatour.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 10:44:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Disk-shaped nebula formed by the winds of the type Wolf-Rayet star WR 134. This blue nebula is embedded within an interstellar region rich in gas and dust clouds in the constellation Cygnus.
  • Usually no mountains required for astrophotography (not many of those in Hamois, Belgium where this is taken), just absence of too much disturbing light or air pollution. When I do aurora photos, I just load my stuff in a shopping caddy and head out to a field near a nature reserve or down to the shore of the fjord. --Cart (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I remember climbing a 5,000 meter peak (Bolivar) for 8 days to take some photos of the stars, but we arrived at the top so tired that we fell asleep in a tent, I remember that taking a step there is like running in a football stadium, my heart beats very fast, but in the middle of the night I woke up to a windless night with incredible clarity, when I saw the sky that night it was so beautiful that I simply began to cry perhaps also affected by the lack of oxygen, I could not think rationally and take the photos properly, but I remember that the sky there is completely different, the stars are brighter and you can see the shapes of the constellations, it is very different from the sky we see.1 2 3 Wilfredor (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer my caddy. :-) Thankfully, we are blessed with clean and clear air here. Btw, remember we have the Perseids this weekend. Fingers crossed for no clouds! --Cart (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We hope we can have a clear day here too, it's best to get away from the city (if possible) to avoid all that light pollution. Wilfredor (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do my astrophotography right from my home terrace. I can even catch some sleep during the night while my equipment snaps away automatically ;)
[1] Picture of my setup Luc Viatour (talk) 08:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Totally the best way to do it. :) --Cart (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canoe in abandoned channel, River Ljubljanica, Slovenia.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 09:16:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canoe in abandoned channel, River Ljubljanica, Slovenia

File:Libelule-Anax imperator-femelle-Hamois-Luc-Viatour.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 07:08:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detailed view of a female emperor dragonfly's compound eye

File:020 The lion king Snyggve in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 02:43:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The lion king Snyggve in the Serengeti National Park

File:Alouette de Clotbey Jebil NP.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 21:23:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thick-billed lark (Ramphocoris clotbey) at Jebil national park

File:Machado de Assis by Marc Ferrez.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 16:21:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I don't think it is clever to renominate again and again the same FPCs that get 5 supports or 6 supports, until you get the 7. If a picture gets lack of participation, it is usually an indicator of moderate or low wow. Then it's better to try a different candidate. Otherwise you will exhaust the participants with repetitive visuals. And we will support only to get rid of these patterns. Apart from that, this image is of low quality, in my opinion, even for the period.
See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File: PARQUE ESTADUAL PAULO CÉSAR VINHA - VITOR B. BARBOSA - FOTO 01.jpg
and Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HabitanteComunidadQoM(CDI-CA-MM-00005)-restored.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With all respect, Basile, if I had done it, you'd have every right to complain, but I didn't renominate it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality for 1890? This can be explained in part due to the process of "whitening" Machado de Assis (many photographers at the time perhaps did not want to show the fact that the country's greatest writer was pardo/black). ★ 21:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I worked very hard to try and get the skin tone as close to correct as I could with this image. I found a report calling him a "light-skinned mestizo" - I believe the term is much more acceptable in South America - so I'm not sure what's perfect, but I did my best. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The jacket is ok but not the face -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With all respect, Adam, you're not responsible. But ArionStar had been warned several times in the past, with quite clear messages. I understand this is your picture and want it promoted, since you nominated it the first time. But both of you had voted already last week. So what do you expect? Many of us may get tired with such repetitive tasks, if it gets a norm. Let's maintain FPC as an enthusiastic and emulative voting place instead, with diversity.
If a picture fails, no problem, just accept the consensus and try something better! See the list of similar candidatures which didn't pass last month, only because one or two votes were missing:
score 5-0, score 6-0, score 5-0, score 7-4, score 13-7, score 7-4, score 5-2, score 6-1, score 5-2, score 6-0, score 5-3, score 5-0. Imagine all of them nominated for a second round, hell :-) "Okay, bad luck, I'll try again next week" :-)
We had related discussions in previous nominations and the FP talk page, and I remember most of the people consider we have to wait a relatively long period of time before renominating a picture, unless there are modifications made since the last time. Which is not the case here. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you show that discussion? ★ 01:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eagle Nebula from ESO.jpg/2. Just read the comments -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is similar to Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 7.jpg/2 also nominated by the same user ArionEstar = ArionStar = ★ with the reason "Per 6 supports × 0 opposes.". This result may impact the voting process in the future. Adam Cuerden is certainly aware of this "tacit rule" since he made this suggestion in the FPC talk page in 2019 . @Ikan Kekek: proposed to wait at least 12 months here. Like Daniel Case's procedural oppose, many participants agree. What others think? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the issue. Yann (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. We might have been misled by the comment associated to your template here, then? Thanks for your comment -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, i was too late to notice the previous nomination and did not have time to vote in support first nomination. This renomination corrects my oversight, and i do not see a serious problem with the renomination. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(My nominations usually become a forum.) ★ 07:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
💡 Nice to know. Thanks for your response, George. Then it's just that FPC is currently evolving towards unpredictable directions. Will follow this case with the greatest interest! All the best -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-07-28 Motorsport, IDM, 89. Internationales Schleizer Dreieckrennen STP 2006 by Stepro.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 16:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Motorsport, IDM, 89th International Schleizer Dreieck Race: Freddie Heinrich (GER, Germany) on the back wheel after the final lap; stunt

File:Gawthorpe Hall 2016 038.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 09:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gawthorpe Hall

File:Front view of Jibokjae Hall under blue sky at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 05:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front view of Jibokjae Hall under blue sky at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul

File:Lac du Miey (5).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 04:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac du Miey in commune of Laruns, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France

File:Lac Roumassot (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 04:28:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac Roumassot in commune of Laruns, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France

File:018 Lilac-breasted roller in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 03:33:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lilac-breasted roller in the Serengeti National Park

File:P.L. Travers as Titania in a production with Alan Wilkie.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 19:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Insel Poel, Kaltenhof, Steilküste -- 2024 -- 5496-500.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 19:12:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coast near Kaltenhof on the island of Poel, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany

File:Kühlungsborn, Vorplatz Seebrücke, Laternen -- 2024 -- 5147.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 19:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lanterns on the forecourt of the pier at sunset, Kühlungsborn, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

File:Blühendes Strand-Milchkraut (Glaux maritima) am Strand von Norderney 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 14:41:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flowering sea milkwort (lysimachia maritima) at the beach of Norderney

File:Interior view of Beomeosa temple with two Buddhist monks in Busan South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 02:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of Beomeosa temple with two Buddhist monks in Busan South Korea

The four evangelists at the pulpit of St. Genesius (Riedböhringen)

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2024 at 09:23:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • View from the nave
    View from the nave
  • Matthew
    Matthew
  • Mark
    Mark
  • Luke
    Luke
  • John
    John
  • View from the chancel
    View from the chancel
  •  Oppose First and last pictures are not extraordinary, in my opinion. Unexceptional angles of view, distorsions in the first case, yellowish interior light. The four statues also seem quite repetitive. When opened individually, each image has limited wow factor, I think. The last one, if nominated alone, would certainly fail, due to the composition. Thus the only reason to be part of this set seems to show the stairs, which are not really special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info 1.) It is not a yellowish light, but the walls are slightly beige. You can check it by comparing them with the white tablecloth in the left picture. 2.) The reason was not to show the stairs, but it was, in connection with the first picture, the only way to show the position of the four evangelists at the pulpit. --Llez (talk) 09:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • In a set, each picture should be FP-level, and not only "in connection with" the others. That angle, with the angel from behind, numerous busy elements, uneven ground, and shadows, is particularly unappealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ботанический сад, водоем.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2024 at 03:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pond in Tashkent botanical garden. Yunusabad District, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

File:Ibis hadada (Bostrychia hagedash), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-24, DD 23.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 17:18:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hadada ibis (Bostrychia hagedash), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania
  • Like Basile pointed out above, this bird is rare to see (in fact, I've only seen it once). Wild life shot at long distance (600 mm) and still 24 MPx. It can always be sharper but still a decent shot under the given conditions. Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Novak Djokovic - Roland-Garros - 28.05.2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 06:02:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
It's always polite to ask first and not just barge in on someone else's nomination. --Cart (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Vineyard snail aestivating

File:Brazil Nordest House interior.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 20:20:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brazil Nordest House interior

File:Miradouro das Rocas 2023-03-13-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 00:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Miradouro das Rocas

File:Panama canal panoramic.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 23:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Fomitopsis pinicola 2023 G1.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red Banded Polypore (Fomitopsis pinicola)

File:Intérieur de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:44:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Intérieur de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Wed 07 Aug → Mon 12 Aug
Thu 08 Aug → Tue 13 Aug
Fri 09 Aug → Wed 14 Aug
Sat 10 Aug → Thu 15 Aug
Sun 11 Aug → Fri 16 Aug
Mon 12 Aug → Sat 17 Aug

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sat 03 Aug → Mon 12 Aug
Sun 04 Aug → Tue 13 Aug
Mon 05 Aug → Wed 14 Aug
Tue 06 Aug → Thu 15 Aug
Wed 07 Aug → Fri 16 Aug
Thu 08 Aug → Sat 17 Aug
Fri 09 Aug → Sun 18 Aug
Sat 10 Aug → Mon 19 Aug
Sun 11 Aug → Tue 20 Aug
Mon 12 Aug → Wed 21 Aug

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=884719385"