|
|
Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-08-05 08:38 (UTC) |
Scope:
144 rue de Lastie, Cahors |
- No. But can we just nominate "Monument historique" in France ? This one is listed in the "Site patrimonial remarquable" of Cahors... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment we are not authorized to appoint Monument historique in France.--Pierre André (talk) 08:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hein ? Quoi ? Comment ? Pardonne-moi, mais je ne comprends pas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sebring12Hrs: Nous ne pouvons pas de notre propre initiative créer une rubrique Monument historique en France. La protection d’un bien patrimonial au titre des monuments historiques apporte à ce dernier un statut juridique spécifique, qui est une servitude d’utilité publique, et une reconnaissance de son intérêt historique, artistique. La demande de protection d’un immeuble est à adresser à la direction régionale des affaires culturelles (DRAC) de votre région. Cet immeuble ne figure pas aux Liste des monuments historiques de Cahors. Cordialement,--Pierre André (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok mais quel est le rapport avec mon intervention et la nomination en image de valeur ? Et pourquoi la nomination n'est-elle plus visible dans la liste ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Best in scope@Sebring12Hrs: le problème est corrigé suite à une erreur de balise et donc suppression du doublon. Cordialement à toi. --Pierre André (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Salut! Stp, qqn pourrait m’expliquer pk cette photo du "monument" serait la meilleure de la rue? Y’a plein de vues pis d’endroits différents sur une rue, j’trouve ça tough de comprendre comment une photo d’un bâtisse pourrait être la meilleure pour un scope aussi large. Merci! --Wilfredor (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Wilfredor: the scope is clear it is the building located at 144 rue de Lastie, Cahors, and not the best photo of the street, moreover it listed in the Site patrimonial remarquable of Cahors.. Best regard. --Pierre André (talk) 22:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 09:01 (UTC) |
Scope:
Russian corvette Ivanovets, left side view in 2012 |
Reason:
Photo used in articles, geocoded.
On 21 July 2023, during training exercises in the the Black Sea, Ivanovets sank the Ukrainian corvette Ternopil with an anti-ship cruise missile.
Later Ivanovets was attacked in the Black Sea by Ukrainian forces using maritime drones on 1 February 2024, and was sunk. -- George Chernilevsky talk |
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review it! (edit) |
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 17:14 (UTC) |
Scope:
Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia, left side view in 2012 |
Reason:
Geocoded an used in articles. The only Ukrainian submarine. Zaporizhzhia was captured in 2014 during the Russian occupation of Crimea -- George Chernilevsky talk |
- Thanks for your review. In the scope, the year is important, since there were changes in paint and markings and even a change in the country of ownership due to capture. The side view, frontal or rear view are also very different. The left and right sides of ships and submarines (include this submarine) are very often not symmetrical. Therefore, i believe the scope is indicated correctly. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The other image you selected does not meet all the criteria (not geocoded). The image is very low quality. Also, this is right side (different drainage holes, anchor hatch in the bow). The submarine is gray in the old paint. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|